A response
to Puhipau and Joan Lander’s Act of War:
The Overthrow of the Hawaiian Nation (1993), a stylized recreation/documentary
of a period in colonial Hawaii.
I watched a disturbing documentary this week concerning the history of
Hawaii as being a part of the United States, titled Act of War: The Overthrow of the Hawaiian Nation (1993) and it’s no
wonder that many Hawaiian people resent being called “Americans.” I’d be pretty upset too if some strangers
showed up at my house one day, spreading diseases, telling me I needed to live
a different lifestyle, killing off my family and friends, using religion to
justify their actions and consequences, and then telling me it was their house
now. Of course, it didn’t quite happen
like that for the Hawaiian people because for them it was a lengthy and
devastating process that changed Hawaii forever.
Prior to the onset of colonial
influence, the Hawaiian people lived off the land and sea in a communal
environment that was truly “for the people, by the people.” They had their own culture, and their own
language. They had their own
agriculture, seafaring techniques, and methods of navigation. They were independent and proud. European explorers changed all of that
starting with Captain Cook’s discovery of the islands in 1778. This was swiftly followed by missionaries
imposing European religious beliefs and practices, instituting a New England way
of living and dress code, and the rapid diminishing of the native Hawaiian
population. Hawaii became the target of
exploitation for profit, and there was an explosive increase in immigrant workers
for sugar plantations. Hawaii was
recognized as a strategic military position in the mid-Pacific, not to mention
a tropical paradise playground with tremendous tourism potential, and there was
a continuous U.S. Naval presence among the islands. Queen Lili’uokalani succeeded King Kalakaua following
his death, and attempted to establish a new constitution that restored government
power to native Hawaiians. This was not
looked upon favorably by the white provisional government in Hawaii, and a plan
was devised to remove the Queen from her position. In 1893 there was an unjustified military
occupation, and the Queen peacefully resigned to annexation to avoid clashing
against U.S. armed forces for the sake of humanity.
It was soon recognized that Hawaii
was wrongfully taken over, and it seemed that the mistake would be corrected,
but Hawaii was eventually annexed into statehood regardless. The U.S. was concerned about becoming a
global military power, and Hawaii was essential to that plan. In 1993 President Bill Clinton saw this
documentary and issued a formal apology to the Hawaiian people on behalf of the
United States for the wrongful taking of Hawaii, but to this day Hawaii is no
closer than it was then to becoming the independent nation it once was.
A similar story of loss could be
told for the Native Americans that suffered at the hands of the United States
as well. They also lost their land,
language and culture. The truth is that
America was formed by people escaping oppression who, in turn, oppressed others
in order to build an idea of freedom. So
my message to American citizens is this: Don’t take what freedom you have for
granted because it wasn’t free at all.
Millions of people lost their lives, cultures were extinguished, and
lives continue to be sacrificed to this day to preserve our way of life. Be respectful to those who are still around
whose land you are living on, and even apologize to them for being here. I understand that if it wasn’t us it would
have been somebody else, but it’s just sad that the rest of the world couldn’t
live in the kind of communal fashion that existed among the Hawaiian people
prior to colonialism.
Image courtesy of:
For a preview of the film:

The analogy you used empathizing that if it was your house and strangers started to take over and spread their diseases and imposing their way of life are pretty spot on. Comparing what the Americans did to the Native Americans was also a good way to showcase the violations of international law in History
ReplyDelete